2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. In 2007 or before that, the Plaintiff received a elbow replacement operation from a veterans hospital, etc., and thereafter, the Plaintiff’s left-hand part part of the elbow joints was returned to a human mission Section.

B. On March 18, 2009, the Plaintiff was admitted to the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”). At the time, there was a saves of the saves and the saves of the saves of the saves of the saves of the saves of the saves of the saves of the saves of

Accordingly, on May 24, 2009, the Plaintiff received celbow surgery from Defendant Hospital C (hereinafter “instant celbow surgery”) from Defendant Hospital doctor C, and received from D climine celfing surgery and celbine celfing surgery (hereinafter “instant celfing surgery”).

C. At present, the scope of active exercise by the Plaintiff is limited to 60 new field restriction, 105, 105, 30, 15, 15, 110, 110, 45, 45, 150, 80, 80, 80, 150, 15, 15, 15, 15, 30, 45, 30, 30, 45, 60, 60, 630, 630, 630, 630, 80, 80, 80, and 80, 45, 10, 10, 100, 15, 15, 60, 60, 630, 630, 630, 630, 630, 30, 30.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the result of the physical examination commission to the director of the E Hospital in this court, the results of the examination entrustment of records of medical examination, and the fact inquiry results, the purport of the whole oral argument

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant hospital performed each of the instant surgery without any inspection by the Defendant hospital doctor D, who did not know the Plaintiff’s condition even after the Defendant hospital doctor C treated the Plaintiff, and the Defendant hospital operated the Plaintiff without any preparation.