성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강간)
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2014. 01. 19. 23:30경 김해시 D에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 지인으로부터 소개받아 알고 지내던 피해자 E(여, 48세)에게 전화하여 피해자의 방세를 마련해 줄 테니 술 마시러 오라고 하여 집으로 불러들인 후 피해자에게 성관계를 제의하였다가 거절당하자, 나가려는 피해자의 머리채를 잡아당겨 방으로 끌고 들어간 다음 피해자를 침대에 넘어뜨리고 “너 오늘 못 먹으면 죽여서라도 너 먹어야겠다.”고 윽박지르며 흉기인 식칼(길이 28cm)과 위험한 물건인 가위(길이 24cm)를 순차 피해자의 목 등에 겨누어 반항을 억압하고 피해자를 강간하려고 하였으나, 피해자가 화장실에 숨고 문을 잠그는 바람에 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다.
2. The summary of the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant's demand that the victim have a sexual intercourse at the time and place specified in the facts charged was true, but the defendant did not use violence or intimidation against the victim due to food knife and knife, and further did not use violence or intimidation to make it impossible or considerably difficult to resist the victim.
3. Determination
A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by a prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes a judge not having reasonable doubt as to whether the facts charged are true. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the doubt of guilt against the defendant is between the suspect even if there is no such evidence.
Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9633 Decided November 11, 2010, etc.). B.
Whether or not the defendant has assaulted or threatened a victim with any deadly weapon, etc., shall be consistent from the police to the court.