When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 9, 2020, at around 22:45, the Defendant reported to the effect that the “C cafeteria was working” on the front of the “C cafeteria in the racing city, the Defendant: (a) sent out after having received 112 reports; and (b) obstructed the Defendant’s defect in order to verify the circumstances and personal details of the instant case against the party involved in the instant police box E during the Police Station, including the circumstances in which the instant police box was called “I, I, and I, but is not different; (c) Ga, I, and I, our match movement; and (d) Ga, I would stop the front of the police officer, who tried to return to the police box after cutting off the front of the said police officer, and assault the parts of the said police officer’s clothes by cutting off the front of the police officer, and then cutting off his clothes.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the police in relation to the defendant's legal statement E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (as regards the receipt of 112 reports and site conditions), internal investigation reports (on-site photographs), internal investigation reports (as regards the attachment of a list of police officials, place of duty, and 112 reports;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the degree of assault is relatively minor, the police officer's personal information is known to him/her, and there are parts of cooperation, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc.