However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 25, 2016, the Defendant driven BST6 vehicle around 07:30 on April 25, 2016, and changed the lane at a speed of 166.3 km or 173.5 km at a speed of 80 km in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu Inter-dong, which is a 80 km speed.

In such cases, the defendant has a duty of care to inform the change of lanes in advance by operating direction, etc., and to prevent the occurrence of accidents by safely driving the steering direction and brakes by properly manipulating the steering direction and brakes while keeping the flow of the front and rear side vehicles well.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant, while changing the lanes from three lanes to two lanes, was first changed from one lane to two lanes, the Defendant received the part of the driver’s seat in front of the victim C(62 cc) driving of the Dunayst taxi in front of the steering seat of the victim C(62 cc) with the vehicle of the Defendant, and due to its shock, the said taxi collisions on the left wall of the underground roadway, and then turn back the taxi to three lanes on one direction, and became the part of the driver’s seat in the victim E(37 cc) driving of the victim E(37 cc) who was in front of the last three lanes.

Accordingly, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim C, who is a taxi engineer, on the right side part, such as strings, strings, and strings, on the part of the passenger G (16 years old), on the part of the victim G (16 years old), on the part of the passenger of the taxi, on the part of the victim H (16 years old), on the part of the taxi in need of approximately 2-day medical treatment, and inflicted on the victim E, who is the driver of Lone Starsch Rexroth driver, on the part of the victim, on the part of the victim E, on the part of the need for approximately 2-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in C and E preparation;

1. The actual survey report of each traffic accident;

1. Each letter of diagnosis;