성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
[Defendant A] A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months and by a fine of ten thousand won.
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
[2018 Highest 8774] Defendant A is a business owner operating sexual traffic businesses under the trade name of “K” on the lease of the Gangnam-gu Seoul E building F, G, H, I, and J.
Defendant
B is a person who has served as the head of the business office to receive a reservation telephone for customers or to manage guest rooms and female employees of sexual traffic.
From the beginning of July 2018 to September 5, 2018, the Defendants received 1.30,000 to 2.10,000 won from the customers who found their places at the above establishment as the price for sexual traffic, and guide them to the relevant guest room, and let the female employees of sexual traffic do sexual intercourse.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.
[2019 Highest 660] Defendant A is the owner who operates an officetel entertainment business in the trade name of Gangnam-gu Seoul Etel G and H, “M,” and Defendant C is the head of the above business.
Defendants simultaneously commit the same year from April 2018, 201 to the first police officer.
6. Until August 18, 200, sexual traffic women, such as Q (V, 2) who received 130,000 won or 260,000 won as the sexual traffic price from male sexual purchases, who discovered commercial sex advertisements posted on the above officetels G, H, andO, and had them do the sexual intercourse with the above gender buyers.
As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.
[2019 Highest 1620] Defendant B is a person who, from the beginning of July 2018 to September 5, 2018, worked as the head of a sexual traffic business office of the trade name “K” operated by A in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Etel F, G, H, I, and J, and, at the same time, he would be punished even when he was punished by a fine when he was controlled by the police. Defendant B is a person who, from the beginning of October 2018, operated the said EtelR, S, and Defendant D is the head of the said “T”.
Defendants simultaneously start from October 2018 to November 2018, 2018.