However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 10, 2015, at around 20:00, the Defendant received a request from C to ask for the care of ‘a door door door' to monitor the vicinity of an investigative agency in preparation for the crackdown on investigation agency. From this point to 02:30 the following day, C waiting in the passenger car prepared by the Defendant and waiting in the passenger car, and made it easy for C to open and operate the 'Ba’ gambling house on the fifth floor of the above building on the 5th floor from considering the network compared to the police control.

As a result, the Defendant aided and aided the opening of gambling C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 247 and 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts (elective of imprisonment);

1. Article 32(2) of the Criminal Act mitigated for aiding and abetting, and Article 55(1)3 of the same Act

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The degree of the defendant's participation in sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the defendant's criminal records (two million won in 2012, a fine of two million won in 2014, a fine of two million won in 2014, etc.) and the defendant's attitude presented after committing the crime, the defendant's occupation, age, living relationship, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order.