However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cargo vehicle of 25 tons in B.

On July 29, 2020, around 10:01, the Defendant proceeded along a four-lane road of 451 km from the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel to the parallel parallel parallel parallel.

At the time, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed for the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle, to live well at the front, and to prevent the accident by safely driving according to the traffic signal.

The Defendant neglected this, while entering the intersection in violation of the signal while the vehicle signal was stopped, the Defendant was placed in front of the Defendant’s vehicle driving ahead of the left part of the DNA learning vehicle driven by the victim C (ISe, 51) who was going to turn to the left from the right side of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the closure of chests that require approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement hearing report;

1. The actual survey report and the report on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act lies in traffic accidents in violation of the signal and the degree of negligence, the defendant's failure to agree with the victim despite the degree of injury of the victim, the defendant recognizes the crime, the cargo vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy, the victim's negligence is serious in violation of the signal, and the defendant has the same power.