2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant's wrong recognition, and the defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic is recognized as favorable circumstances to the defendant, such as the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment other than a fine of two million won due to the crime of injuring the defendant around 2002. However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have considerable social harm by commercializing women's sex and impairing sound sexual culture and good morals, and it is necessary to cut off against the owner of the business that operates illegal sexual traffic businesses even in order to prevent the spread of the illegal sexual traffic businesses and to establish a sound sexual culture. The period of the operation of the sexual traffic businesses of this case is long, and there is no considerable amount of criminal profits acquired therefrom, and in full view of various circumstances that are conditions for the punishment of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., the defendant's above assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted. Thus, the defendant's above assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.