Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On September 21, 2013, the Defendant posted a letter, “On the Internet NVber Caf,” “C with fraudulent change,” and “C and D (D) with the last one-half of the last one-half of the last one-half months, with intellectual and bad character, using a typical method of the professional small-sum fraud. Of them, I fraudulently sold a good child in the state of B-sale bulletin board,” and thereby impairing the honor of the victim C and D by pointing out false facts, such as the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on documentary evidence;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;