A. In fact-finding (as to the sale of philophones), the Defendant purchased philophones from Co-Defendant I in collaboration with Co-Defendant I, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case that the Defendant purchased philophones from I and sold philophones again to the above B, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the fact and affecting the conclusion

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one year and four months of imprisonment, additional collection of 50,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground that: (a) the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court; (b) the Defendant’s fluencing fluencing flucing fluencing fluencing fluencing fluencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing; and (c) the Defendant did not fully mention fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing;

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

B. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing generally recognizes the instant facts charged and reflects the instant facts charged, the Defendant is sentenced to a punishment or a fine on several occasions for the same type of crime.