A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese occupation occupation period, G with the address in F is indicated as being subject to the assessment of G with the address in F.

B. Since then, the land before the instant partition was divided into 1,775 square meters in Pyeongtaek-si H (hereinafter “instant land”) via the division, land category change, administrative district change, and area conversion registration, and then divided into 1,775 square meters in J-si H (hereinafter “instant land”); J J-do 803 square meters in size; K 1,726 square meters in size.

C. The registration of ownership preservation was completed on July 19, 1957 with respect to the instant land under L. However, on July 21, 201, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under the Defendant’s name on the ground of expropriation of the instant land for M district and housing site development business on July 21, 201, stating that “L (resident registration number and address disturbance)” and “I will deposit the entire amount of the adjudication compensation as if the deposited person did not indicate the owner or address of the instant land,” and “I will deposit the entire amount of the adjudication compensation as if the deposited person did not indicate the owner or address of the instant land.”

On April 14, 1969, N, as the plaintiffs' wife and children, jointly succeeded to the property of the deceased N (the deceased's wife), the plaintiff A (the deceased's wife), the plaintiff B, the plaintiff C, and the married father (the marriage on February 17, 1965), and P (the marriage on February 25, 1965). After the death of theO, the plaintiffs and P, who finally are their children, jointly succeeded to the deceased as shown in the corresponding inheritance column in the annexed inheritance sheet.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-6 evidence, Eul 1-3 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Since registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the name of N, the plaintiffs' prior to the plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties to the land of this case, the owner of the land of this case is N, and the plaintiffs are co-inheritors of the network N, as shown in the attached inheritance list.