When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around September 10, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “DDak” located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, would have the victim E take employment without the framework of the Party’s children.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to get the victim to find employment in the Gwangju subway Corporation.

Around September 14, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of funds for expenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement in the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for verification;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act for the crime (including the selection of fines, the fact that the defendant is not in good health for the aged, the fact that the defendant is against the law, and the amount of fraud);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;