부당노동행위구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the decision on retrial;
A. On September 7, 1992, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as Grade 10 (Local Assistant Officers) and served in the Department F in Daegu Metropolitan City B, C, D, E, etc. from January 21, 2009 through Daegu Metropolitan City B, C, D, E, etc.
B. On January 16, 2013, Defendant Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) took disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).
According to Articles 48, 49, and 50 of the Local Public Officials Act, “public officials shall observe Acts and subordinate statutes, faithfully perform their duties, and shall obey an official order of their superior officer in performing their duties, and shall not leave their workplace without the permission of their superior officer or without good cause.” However, on February 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was elected to the so-called National Public Officials’ Union G G on February 1, 2012, and shall be elected from March 2, 2012.
5. Until March 21, 200, he/she left his/her workplace without permission from the head of the department to which he/she belongs to work as the office of the National Public Officials Workers' Union located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and actually engaged in illegal labor union activities, and the head of the department to which he/she belongs fails to comply with an order to return his/her workplace three times ( March 6, 2012; March 4, 2012) and is absent from work without permission;
On May 21, 2012, an application for childcare leave was filed for one year from May 21, 2012, and on May 22, 2012, the next day is treated as leave of absence, and the present status is currently.
C. The Plaintiff filed an application for remedy with the Gyeongbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission that the instant disposition constitutes unfair labor practices, but the Gyeongbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for remedy on June 4, 2013.
On September 24, 2013, the National Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for reexamination on September 24, 2013.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant decision by reexamination”). [Ground of recognition] A without dispute, and entry in Gap’s 2 through 4, respectively.