2. The crime of this case is deemed to be inferior in light of the fact that the defendant, even though he had the same criminal records, repeatedly leads to the crime of this case.

However, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, method of criminal conduct, and circumstances after the crime of this case, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the defendant's benefit acquired by the crime of this case is minor; (b) the defendant is old; (c) the defendant was only one time from the defendant's previous record; and (d) the defendant reflects his wrongness; and (c) the circumstances leading to

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.