사기등
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and a fine of 2.5 million won for a crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On May 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months for fraud at the Ulsan District Court on May 27, 201, and the sentence became final and conclusive on January 12, 2012.
[Criminal facts]
1. On December 18, 2008, the Defendant, a fraudulent D employee, was awarded a successful contract for the removal of unused facilities from the Chemical Textiles Manufacturing Business Co., Ltd., to D (radioactive equipment and raw material supply facilities that produce the room), and the sales authority for the removal and scrap metal (hereinafter “the removal construction of this case”) from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the removal construction of this case”). D transferred D the removal construction of this case to the G G Management Co., Ltd., operated by F around January 6, 2009 at KRW 870,000,000,000,000,000, and around January 2009, the G Co., Ltd transferred the removal construction of this case to the Plaintiff, a collection company operated by the victim H, and the Defendant transferred the removal construction of this case to the Plaintiff and the parties concerned and the Defendant to the G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the removal construction of this case”).
From May 2009, the Defendant was the first police officer on May 2, 2009.
6. The fact that the defendant displayed the radiation generator equipment to the victim on the rooftop of a factory in the Nam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Ulsan Special Metropolitan City, and the defendant received additional removal construction works for the facilities, such as the 2 to 5th rooftop electric power lines and pipes, from the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Construction Bank.
In explaining the victim, “the additional removal works shall be KRW 120 million” to the victim.
“.....”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have ordered the removal of the additional removal from the LABE, and the defendant ordered the additional removal to the victim.
The facilities, however, have been abused that the victim was already included in the removal construction of this case that was acquired by the said G by the Plaintiff, but the victim was unaware of what was the object of removal.
On the other hand, K, which had worked at the site of the removal project in this case, is the defendant.