도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below sentenced to the defendant (two years of suspended sentence in August and forty hours of order to attend a lecture in 8 months) is too uneasable and unfair.
2. Taking into account the various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant judgment records and arguments, the lower court’s sentence is too unfasible and unreasonable, even considering the circumstances asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure). However, ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the second sentence below was pronounced.
“A summary order was notified.”
“Aro-friendly”