2. The judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, and it is recognized that the defendant agreed with the victim D, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, S, T, U, and W in the court below, paid the amount of damage to the victim B, and reached an additional agreement with the victim V in the trial.

However, the crime of this case is not very good, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the suspension period of execution for the same kind of crime even though he had been tried several times, and the number of victims reaches several times, and considering the sentencing balance with the same kind of crime, the sentencing balance with the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstance after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, it is evident that the “total of KRW 1,530,00” in the second 9 parallels of the judgment below is a clerical error of “total of KRW 1,950,000 over 11 times”, and the judgment of the court below is modified in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure