2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The plaintiff has been engaged in the business of establishing office furniture, etc., and for a period of ten years, the plaintiff concluded a construction contract with the defendant for a household produced by the defendant between the defendant and the defendant and continued construction.

B. However, without any grounds, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff erred in the construction and notified the plaintiff that the costs incurred due to the defect will be deducted.

The payment of the construction cost as described in the paragraph has not been made.

C. The Defendant’s unpaid construction cost is ① KRW 5,434,070 at the construction site of the Limited Han Station, ② Labor cost of August 6, 2012; ② Labor cost of KRW 615,884; ③ Labor cost of KRW 825,00 on October 2012; ④ Labor cost of KRW 212,694 on December 1, 2012; ⑤ Labor cost of KRW 10,000 on October 1, 2013; ② Not paid KRW 3,024,000 on the installation cost of clothes, etc. at the Natural Generation of the Human Nature School; ② Labor cost of KRW 12,129,23,84 on November 1, 2013; ② Labor cost of KRW 23,070 on the three occasions, such as personnel cost of d.S. A. and d. d. d. d. d. 96, 2014; and ④ labor cost of KRW 165.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the above construction cost and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

2. In light of the determination on the cause of the claim, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone alone does not specify the specific construction contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the unpaid amount of the construction cost, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.