At around 15:20 on November 29, 2012, the Defendant reported that the Government Do-dong's Do-dong's Do-si's Do-dong's underground space had a long term, and that the victim C (59 years of age) had a long term at the Seo-si's Do-dong's Do-dong's Do-si. The Defendant got the victim's bath due to a defect in the victim's bath, and she got the victim's hair back to the floor. When the victim's face was taken one time due to drinking, the Defendant inflicted the victim's injury such as a math in the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. The scope of the final sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines from January to June of the term of imprisonment in accordance with the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime, Article 257(1) of the selection of the term of imprisonment: The scope of the final sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines for the punishment of imprisonment: From April to June of the term of imprisonment [the type of crime]] the general injury criteria among the violent crime group (special person] there is no aggravated and mitigated element: [the scope of the recommended sentence] there is no general injury criteria in the basic area (from April to June of the term of imprisonment): The mitigated element that there is no general aggravated element in the sentencing guidelines for the sentencing guidelines: the defendant who has determined the serious half sentence divided the crime of this case, is against the law, and partly deposited money for the victim, etc.

However, most of the past and past violent crimes including the instant crime committed 10 times against unspecified persons on the way, and in the case of the instant crime, the period for treating the victim was not revealed because the victim did not cease the diagnosis (the victim did not cut the diagnosis), but it appears to have suffered a large amount of injury, such as the victim's statement and the victim's photograph, etc., in light of the above, it is difficult to view that the Defendant appears to have an attitude against the victim, but it is difficult to view that there is no possibility of recidivism.

Therefore, the defendant is sentenced to a severe warning.