beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.10.02 2014노4073

사기등

Text

All prosecutor's appeal against the Defendants is dismissed.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the court below against the defendants (the defendant A: the defendant) is too unafford that the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor of four months, two months, six months, six months, six years of imprisonment with prison labor, two years of suspended execution, and probation is too unafford.

2. The Defendants committed each of the crimes in this case continuously and repeatedly against many unspecified persons using the Internet goods transaction site, the Defendants committed each of the crimes in this case against many and unspecified persons, the victims of each of the crimes in this case, the amount of damage was not specified, most of the damage was not recovered, and the Defendants did not reach agreement with most victims, and the Defendants were punished for the same crime in this case and there were many records of juvenile protective disposition against Defendant A. However, they are against each of their mistake, and there is a need to consider equity in the case of Defendant A’s crimes No. 1 through No. 21 of the list of crimes in the judgment of the court below. In the case of Defendant B, there is no other punishment force prior to each of the crimes in this case, and there is no other punishment force prior to each of the crimes in this case, and the records and arguments of this case, including the age, character, environment, circumstances, means and result of the crime in this case, etc., the Defendants’ punishment against the Defendants cannot be deemed unfair.

3. The applicant for compensation at the trial for the above trial is the victim of the case of Suwon District Court Sung-nam Branch 2014Kadan1533, the defendant B seeking payment of the sum of KRW 350,000,00, such as the money obtained by deception. According to the records, the fact that the defendant B paid the above money to the applicant for compensation at the trial can be recognized.