2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes and against his mistake, and the circumstances such as unmarried economic circumstances, and the fact that there are family members, such as father, etc. of the aged who are not healthy due to the second degree of delay, and that there was an agreement with the victims.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant while driving a taxi at the left part of the taxi left part of the defendant's driver's taxi, causing injury to the victim E, who is the front part of the victim's taxi and did not take any relief measures even after destroying or damaging the damaged vehicle. It is not easy for the court below to impose a punishment on the victim E, who escaped at a very rapid speed after the accident, and the damaged vehicle got ill to the victim E, who attempted to abscond in order to avoid putting the front of the vehicle. The court below seems to have already determined a punishment by taking into account various circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances in the situation at the court below, and taking into account all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, circumstances leading to the crime, etc., and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment cannot be deemed to be unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.