When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 6, 2016, the Defendant appeared to take an oath in the court of Busan District Court No. 353 on January 14:30, 2016, as a witness of the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. against Defendant B (UP).

At around 21:50 on June 15, 2015, B and E asked the Defendant and E, who are female employees, to receive KRW 100,000,00 from two police officers who pretended to be customers, and to engage in sexual traffic as a chemical stand, at the D No. 1440, Jun. 15, 2015, the above case asked B and B to the effect that “When a police officer who pretended to be customers at the above date and time, would not need to pay for sexual traffic expenses in addition to the drinking value” to the Defendant and E who are female employees, the police officer, who is the female employees, and the female employees, at the same time and at the same place, they were aware of the above conversation.” The Defendant was well aware at that place.

Nevertheless, the defendant testified that "I will not see how the two stories are different from the police officers in studio in the studio in the studio of the defense counsel, or how such stories related to sexual traffic might be scam and scam."

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the preparation of each record (No. 2 and 12 No. 12 of the evidence list);

1. Copies of summary order No. 2015 high-ranking 16818;

1. The oath (No. 8 No. 550,00);

1. A certificate of a person;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact of perjury is not recognized until the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is finalized, and the substantial truth and the state punishment authority are appropriate.