If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On January 12, 2012, at around 13:25, the Defendant, along with C, had been engaged in the work of fixing cement board by using electric string machines to install cement type teams at the construction site of the Eburies Construction Work site of the Ebubane, Co., Ltd., Ltd., Inc., Ltd., Ltd., Inc., Ltd., Ltd., D, the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group, and the construction site of the above construction site, there were many inflammable substances, such as installation of lebane pumps, etc., and the construction site of the above construction site, there were lots of inflammable substances around the surrounding areas, and the luborgs around the adjoining site, as the fire risks increase, so the luborgs of the luburgs are not prone to the site where the luborgs of the luburgs are installed, and the construction of the 7th square meters of the building under consideration due to negligence, even though there was a duty of care to check whether it remains before and after the construction work.

Summary of Evidence

1. In the first trial record, the defendant's partial statement to the effect that he/she had been employed by the defendant C around the time of this case;

1. Entry of each part of the protocol of examination of witness F and C in this Court for the witness F and C;

1. Report on the occurrence of each fire accident, request for evaluation at the scene of a fire, request for appraisal, and application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 171, 170 (1), 166, and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant's work is part adjoining to a part, and thus, a fire is very low, and if a fire occurs due to a fire that occurred during the contact, the defendant could immediately be informed, and a few minutes must be postponed after the completion of the contact work.