beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.09.18 2015고단1152

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, and imprisonment for three months.

except that for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 23:10 on February 16, 2015, Defendant A: (a) was under the influence of drinking alcohol along with the daily alcohol, such as B, at a restaurant located in Asan-si; (b) was under the influence of drinking alcohol; (c) was trying to confirm the circumstances of the instant case, including the slope F, and the slope G, assigned to the ASEAN Police Station E box called “I will see whether I have been working or not; and (d) I will see that I will do so; and (e) when I am a slope, I would like to see that I will see, “I will die F. F. F. F. F. F. F. son’s chest with her chest’s breast, she pushed away with G her left slope, and sold it with G her hand, she will walk away with his/her her slope, walking his/her slope, and walked with his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties regarding the prevention and suppression of crimes, such as the handling of reported cases by F and G 112, a police official.

2. Defendant B: (a) arrested Defendant B as a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place as stated in paragraph (1) above; (b) arrested Defendant B as a slope F and a slope G as a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties; and (c) assaulted Defendant B by walking A’s head, etc. with his head, etc., walking with his head, etc., with his arms, cutting off his sloping F and slope by pushing ahead with his arms, cutting off his arms with his hand, cutting down his sloping F and sloping G, and putting them into a slope G.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of crimes, such as the arrest of F and G flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police officer in F and G;

1. Application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and damaged photographs;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act shows the appearance that the Defendants reflects the mistakes, and Defendant A is drunk.