When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The criminal facts were partly revised according to the facts acknowledged within the extent that does not actually disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her defense right.

From March 2016 to May 2016, the Defendant had worked as an employee in the "D" B B of the victim C (V, 47 years of age) located in Busan High-gu.

그러나 피고인은 피해 자로부터 위 근무기간 동안의 임금을 지급 받지 못하자 2016. 9. 경 장소를 알 수 없는 곳에서 인터넷 SNS 메신저인 피해자의 조카인 E의 페이스 북 계정에 접속한 후 위 E의 친구 4~5 명에게 “ 제가 그놈 이모 집 일하고 돈 띵 거 먹혔거든요” 라는 등의 메시지를 발송하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a photograph of the head of a fins North Korea;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the same Act and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is to be mitigated by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s writing posted; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment; (d) motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the commission of the crime.