When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 1, 2014, at around 01:16, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with a taxi engineer on the street in front of the exit of Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, on the ground that a large amount of taxi fares had been under the influence of alcohol; (b) the police box of Seoul Seocho-gu Police Station, who was dispatched upon receipt of the 112 report, controlled the Defendant as a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; (c) the Defendant took the bath theory that “I sway, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright, fright.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Notice for penalty payment;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;