A. The plaintiff A is a person who has completed a legal marriage report with E, and the plaintiff B and C are children of the plaintiff A and E.

B. On May 23, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for damages against the Seoul Eastern District Court 2018Kadan121586, and received a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff that “the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 30 million and its delay damages,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

C. Even after the above judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendant sent contact with E.

On the other hand, around June 2019, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff B and C a postal item containing the message given and received by the Defendant and E, the conversation recording book, etc., and the Plaintiff B sent the Plaintiff’s social network with the thickness of “hings (the Plaintiff A) so that the scarfs were scarfly scarfed, so that the Defendant scarfs were scarfs with the scarf, and attempted to scarfs with the scarfs.

E. The Plaintiffs filed a provisional injunction against the Defendant, Seoul Eastern District Court 2019Kahap10322, and the said court on September 6, 2019, the Defendant, against the intent of the Plaintiffs, shall not access the Plaintiffs within 100 meters or access the Plaintiffs’ workplace or residence. The Defendant shall not interfere with the Defendant’s peaceful life and duties by means of telephone, letter, e-mail, text messages, Kakaoox, and Nuri network.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 7, 12 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 1 to 14, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the overall purport of the Plaintiff’s claim judgment, Gap’s evidence Nos. 5, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 14 and all pleadings, the Defendant is aware that E is a spouse, even after the judgment of the preceding case becomes final and conclusive.