The defendant is a DNA hotel owner E in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim F is a representative managing the above hotel, who has leased the above hotel coffee.

On October 1, 2013, from around 11:20 to 11:50, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s coffee business by force, such as: (a) the victim’s payment of rent within the hotel coffee shop; (b) the victim’s voice; and (c) the victim’s escape behind the client and the chair.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Application of the statutes that contain some statements in the police interrogation protocol concerning F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Act provides that if all circumstances are taken into account, such as the age of the defendant and the absence of criminal records, the circumstances leading to this case, and the degree of injury inflicted on the defendant on the day