beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.06.29 2015고단521

도로법위반

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On August 13, 1997, the Defendant: (a) around 05:24 August 13, 1997, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operated an I cargo vehicle in a state where 12.5 tons of lightcarbon calcium is loaded on the 2nd axis of the said vehicle in excess of 10 tons of the restricted calcium at the front side of Tol, which is a point of 83.5 km of the Gyeong Highway; and (b) violated the restriction on

2. The part of Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008) that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business of the corporation, the sentence of a fine of KRW 1,00,00 has become final and conclusive due to the summary order subject to review, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant is publicly notified pursuant to Article 58 (2)