A. The Defendant filed an application for the seizure of corporeal movables with the Incheon District Court 2017No6120 in accordance with the judgment of the Suwon District Court 2015da12729 agreed deposit case against C. On September 13, 2017, the execution officer of the Incheon District Court seized the corporeal movables (hereinafter “instant corporeal movables”) listed in the separate sheet in the Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang apartment, 306 Dong 304 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. On March 30, 2016, the instant real estate is a house for which the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of “sale on December 10, 2015” in the Plaintiff’s future.

On May 13, 2016, the Plaintiff completed a resident registration transfer report on the instant real estate and thereafter is residing together with Dong E and MaF from that time to that time.

C Around 208, after being released on February 28, 2014 from paroled on February 28, 2014, G building at Namyang-si, Namyang-gu, Mangdong-gu, Ilyang-gu, Seoul, and 801, respectively, was registered on May 19, 201, and the real estate in this case was registered as a resident on November 5, 2015. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27817, May 19, 201; Presidential Decree No. 27479, Oct. 5, 2016>

(The last domicile is the head office of J Co., Ltd. that the plaintiff was appointed as the representative director on June 12, 2015).

Of the instant corporeal movables, Nos. 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, and 16 had been used by the Plaintiff, E, and F prior to their occupancy in the instant real estate. Of them, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11, and 12 had been purchased at the time of the Plaintiff’s occupancy in the instant real estate, and Nos. 4, 7, and 13 had been purchased at the time of E’s occupancy in the instant real estate.

In the instant real estate at the time of the instant compulsory execution, “C” was found to have been prescribed by the Department in K located in the neighborhood around September 9, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 9 through 13 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts, the corporeal movables of this case are classified as follows.