However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 10:30 on February 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) controlled two persons, such as police officers D, etc., to wear a safety cap, and continued to refuse to produce an identification card; (b) expressed a bit of bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, etc., at the session of Dongdaemun-gu in Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul, by 56; and (c) expressed a bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch,” and “I am bit of bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, and bitch, bitch, bitch, etc., of the instant bitch.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (a case accompanying these images);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment (which has the past record of the same kind of crime);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the reflection of the nature and the degree of violence).