2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant confessions and reflects the Defendant’s crime; (b) there is no criminal record of imprisonment or heavier punishment; and (c) the instant case is in a concurrent crime relationship with a crime for which the judgment on the facts constituting the offense of the lower judgment became final and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the same should be

On the other hand, as if the defendant paid the construction cost, the amount acquired by deceiving the victim from the victim reaches KRW 3,743,00,000, and the damage has not been recovered even after several years have passed since then, the victim suffered considerable pain, and the defendant wanted to pay the strict punishment.

In addition to the above various circumstances, comprehensively taking account of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as Defendant’s age, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.