When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

B is the representative of C, the accused, and D are C Staff, and E is the children of the above B.

At around 07:00 on November 9, 2016, the Defendant, B, D, etc.: (a) at the scene of G Apartment Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the victim’s work side H, etc., intends to carry out noise prevention work; (b) obstructed the passage of the Defendant, etc. to the place where the right of retention is exercised and permanently stationed, and (c) prevents the Defendant, etc. from carrying out the work on the side of the said body; and (d) the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s work by blocking the entrance entrance to each construction site by force of approximately 50 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with B, D, and E interfered with the work of the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against B, D, or E;

1. Each police statement concerning K, H and L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police investigation reports (including on-site photographs, etc., accompanying the current status of suspects, records of proof of 112 reported, and CCTV verification);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 314(1) and 310 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;