beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.01.31 2017가단223766

채무부존재확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 5, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a D insurance contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. From May 29, 2014 to May 15, 2017, the Defendant received the Defendant’s medical treatment and the amount of insurance proceeds, 16 times, after undergoing a diagnosis of studio and hardening the left floor of four sites, such as Cprison, and received freezing cponing, and upon receiving the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of insurance proceeds from July 30, 2014 to June 2, 2017, the Defendant received insurance proceeds of KRW 4,80,000 in total.

C. According to the special terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case, the term “flick disease” refers to the infections of the skin and the part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, Gap's 5-1 and 2, and the purport of whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a ground for the payment of expenses for the operation of the skin disease, since freezing is not a passive one guaranteed by the instant insurance contract.