2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the entire crime of this case and against his mistake, there are the wife and children to support the Defendant, the Defendant’s family members and branch members want to leave the Defendant’s preference, and the Defendant stated in the investigative agency about other narcotics offenders such as merchant ships.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant committed the crime of this case two times in the face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face (hereinafter referred to as "the crime of this case"), and the defendant committed the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Provided, That the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply to the bearing of litigation costs.