명예훼손
Defendants are not guilty.
1. Defendant A is the chairperson of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E apartment (hereinafter “E”), Defendant B was the Dong representative of the E 102 Dong, and Defendant C is the head of the E Management Office.
At around 17:00 on July 30, 2012, the Defendants posted printed printed printed materials with the following contents: “I have to know about the exact situation of the residents by adversely affecting the image of E, such as interference with the inciting meeting, inciting residents visiting door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door
However, there was no fact that the victim F, the president of the former 101 tenant representative council, obstructed the meeting by inciting the occupants, visited the residents of subparagraph (a) to instigates them, or threatened the government offices, thereby adversely affecting the image of E.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false representation in public, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.
B. The Defendants, at the same time and place as Paragraph (1) and in the same manner as Paragraph (1), refer to “reasons for the dismissal of the president of the 101 occupant representative council”, “7. progress of the council of occupants’ representatives”, “7. progress of the council of occupants’ representatives”, “101 representative council’s announcement on June 19, so as to be detached from all public announcements to security personnel, and interference with business, “the removal of the notice as a result of the representative council of July 4, and
1. The crime of interference with business by interference with the operation of a meeting by inciting the F Representative Residents' inciting the minutes, by reducing the minutes;
2. The crime of interference with business by removal by F Representative while making a prior notice;
3. Even after the cancellation of the Chairman's position, it has been prepared that it will be "Notice of inducement of the name theft of the representative president" and posted in the E elevator;
As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other to damage the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.
2. Determination
A. Based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.