However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 24, 2018, at around 00:25, the Defendant driven a B B B B B B B B motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of alcohol content of 0.217% from the front of the market in which the new wall of the Dae-gu Seoul Metropolitan City of Daejeon is fluoral, Seo-gu, Seoul, to the front of the Cheongju-si bus terminal both of the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Seoul, with a new wall of the new vibration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of enforcement manual and accident site photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The provision of Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of punishment for a crime under the relevant Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act to reduce the amount of punishment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr. 1, 2006)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the grounds for the said mitigation are repeated);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;