However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, on October 28, 2013, stated in the indictment around 23:20 on October 28, 2013, shall be deemed as a clerical error and shall be corrected ex officio.

On the fourth E main point of the Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City D Building, the Daejeon District Police Station, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report, refused the request for identification from G to verify the identity without any justifiable reason, while refusing the request for identification to G to present the identification card.

The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the "the fact that the defendant gets fulbling in G" as stated in the indictment.

The Defendant was notified by G that he could be arrested as an offender in the act of committing a crime, such as obstruction of business and obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and the Defendant was not enough to recognize “the fact that the Defendant ” as stated in the indictment, as the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone, is insufficient to recognize “the fact that he saw franch, internal, and franchis are francing” by threatening G as “Y franch franchis, and franchis,” at the end of the width.

The police officers such as G were arrested as a flagrant offender and tried not to board the defendant while taking a defective patrol vehicle in order to have the defendant board the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's criminal control and the lawful execution of duties on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of a witness GHIJ in part;

1. Each police statement to GJ;

1. Determination as to the legality of the performance of official duties by using a video recording flash drive or recording book taken at the time of arrest of the suspect

1. Facts found based on evidence submitted by the prosecutor;

A. The Defendant reported 112 employees as to the dispatch of police officers and the process of verifying the fact at the place where the crime was recorded. The Defendant reported 112 employees.

On the same day, GH received a report and immediately arrived at the site at around 23:36 on the same day, and at that time, the Defendant was locked down with the table.

Employees were first dispatched.