A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for 13 years.

Seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

A. The prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court (one hundred years of imprisonment) is too unhued and unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have recognized and reflected the facts of the instant crime is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant: (a) knife knife knife the victim’s knife and knife knife knife knife and knife knife the victim’s dwelling; and (b) knife knife knife knife with the victim’s children despite the victim’s fighting, and knife the victim.

The injured party was trying to prevent the attack of the Defendant, but the knife was created by a cut of 6.4 cm. The Defendant’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

[In light of the overall circumstances surrounding the crime of this case, the defendant's final intention to kill the victim (the judgment of the court below acknowledged the defendant only with the negligence of murder, unlike this, the judgment of the court below).

In light of the fact that the life of a person is seriously heavy and eared with any value on the ground, the motive of the attack cannot serve as a justification for the Defendant’s act of murdering the victim without prejudice, and that it does not interfere with the punishment for such an offense.

The result of the instant crime is very harsh, and the bereaved families of the victims, in particular, the children of the victims who were fluened in front of the death of his father, who were the middle school students, are the victims of the instant crime.