장물취득등
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.
However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.
(2) On September 5, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Juvenile Protection Act, etc. to the Daejeon District Court on September 5, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th of the same month.
[2] The Defendants posted an advertisement to the effect that they purchase smartphones difficult to process on the Internet Twitter, etc., and expressed it to the effect that they will receive a cell phone, which is a stolen, from those who reported and contacted, and will dispose of it as Vietnam, and accordingly, Defendant B purchased DNAs in the Twitter, Facebook, etc., “D: D. Stockholm: Smartphones which are difficult to process.”
Pursuant to the preceding State* Transactionable on the day* immediately for export without upper line.
I will pay the mobile phone unit price.
24. Mao-friendly Counseling Stockholm: E Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma, lost Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma....... Defendant A used the "Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma---" to communicate with the person who reported the above article, and the given mobile phone was recruited to transfer his name to Vietnam.
1. On February 13, 2018, the Defendants jointly purchased stolen goods at KRW 130,000,00, after being aware of the fact that the Defendant’s advertisement posted by Defendant B was stolen from H, the victim J-owned market price of KRW 1 million.
2. Acquisition of stolen goods, and fraud;
A. On March 1, 2018, at the front of the K store located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon on March 1, 2018, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that Defendant A would send 300,000 won of the face value of smartphones to the victim L who reported and contacted the advertisement posted by Defendant B, as above, to the victim L who reported and contacted the advertisement posted by Defendant B, and that it belongs to this purport, when the victim M who acquired the advertisement from the victim L, she would have a gallon of the market price equivalent to one million won of the victim’s market price.