If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, which have not been rated by the Game Rating Board, or display or keep them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from the beginning of June 2012 to October 18:30, 2012, the Defendant installed one game work of “Silfol,” the rating of which was revoked by the Game Rating Board at the D Party run by himself/herself on the third cafeteria in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and provided it to many and unspecified persons for use and obtained a total of KRW 1,60,000.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified by the Rating Board for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each written statement E and A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 1, and Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Selection of and Promotion of the Game Industry for Criminal Facts, Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 and 21

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do5010, Jun. 28, 2012; Supreme Court Decision 2012Do5010, Jun. 28, 2012; Supreme Court Decision 201Do5010, Jun. 28, 2012; Supreme Court Decision 201Do130, Jun. 28, 2012; Supreme Court Decision 201Do130, Jun. 28, 2012).