청구이의
1. To coordinate the cases, such as removal of buildings, etc., with executory force of the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch 201Gadan16651, Sept. 23, 2011.
1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be recognized by comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1-4 and 7.
On June 8, 2009, the Defendant received the sale of the land listed in paragraph (1) of [Attachment 1] List (hereinafter “instant land”) in the voluntary auction procedure, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership on June 12, 2009.
B. On June 17, 2011, the Plaintiff received the sale of the building listed in Attachment 2 List 2 (2) on the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”) in the voluntary auction procedure, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 21, 201.
C. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking the removal of the instant building and the payment of the amount equivalent to the rent for the removal of the instant building from the Suwon District Court, which was set up on September 23, 2011, on the date of open conciliation (i.e., August 20, 2011 to the date on which the Plaintiff loses ownership, the Plaintiff shall be paid to the Defendant an amount equivalent to KRW 1.5 million per month from August 20, 201 to the date on which the Plaintiff loses ownership, but the payment of the rent shall not be increased for 15 years. 2. The Defendant waived the remainder of the claim (hereinafter referred to as the “instant conciliation decision”). This became final and conclusive.
The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on June 9, 2009 to June 15, 201, for payment of usage fees of KRW 38,153,841 as to the instant land from June 9, 2009 to June 15, 201, or for payment of delay damages therefor, or for cooperation in the implementation of the procedures for the registration of creation of superficies as to the instant land at the rate of KRW 1,500,000 per month. On January 19, 2012, “1.” As to the instant land at the date of open conciliation on January 19, 2012, ① the Defendant owned the instant land by the Plaintiff on August 20, 201, within the scope of possession of the instant land, in whole, until the existence of the land, and superficies as the Plaintiff with superficies, and superficies as the Plaintiff with superficies; hereinafter the instant case.