beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.01.21 2014노1901

식품위생법위반등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not import or sell cosmetics, food, medicine, or drugs listed in (1), (2), and (2) of the crime sight table attached to the lower judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On February 10, 2012, the lower court duly admitted and examined the allegation of mistake as follows: ① the Defendant purchased goods from Indonesia in the name of Indonesia on or around February 10, 2012, the number 1 through 8 as indicated in the crime inundation table (1) and the number 1 through 7 as a selective distribution; and on October 18, 2013, it stated that the Defendant purchased goods from Indonesia in the name of the Republic of Korea on or around October 18, 2013, and sold them to Sri Lankan in its name (Evidence 9 through 12 as indicated in the list of crimes and (2) as indicated in the list of crimes (Evidence 504-508 as evidence), and that the Defendant stated that the Defendant’s name and the Defendant’s use of the goods was only a legitimate statement on behalf of the Defendant, and that the Defendant’s use of the goods was also a legitimate statement on the designated goods of G indonesia in accordance with the following reasoning.

B. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing, food, drugs, and cosmetics are related to the assertion of unfair sentencing.