The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by using as evidence a protocol of interrogation of the police suspect against the Defendant without admissibility of evidence, by misapprehending the rules of logic and experience, and by exceeding the limits of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the possibility of lawful acts in relation to the application of Articles 10 and 23 subparag. 3 of the Assembly and Demonstration Act or the establishment of obstruction of general traffic.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.