On December 21, 2017, the Defendant of the 2018 High Order 3605, the Defendant wishes to receive revenues from other accounts for the purpose of reducing taxes from his/her employees, who are named “B” under the name of “B” and “B” telecommunications gold fraud (hereinafter “Sing”).

On the same day, upon receiving a proposal to the effect that the deposit account in the name of the party is to be deposited and notified in cash, the account shall be deposited in the bank account in the name of the party, and the account number (Account Number: E) in the name of the defendant was notified to the above-mentioned name in the name of the defendant.

1. On December 20, 2017, the non-indicted singing employee in the name of aiding and abetting the victim F and aiding the attempted fraud and misrepresenting the victim F with the phone call from the victim F to the victim H agency in G bank. “On the other hand, the victim would make a so-called Masing passbook at a low interest rate if he/she redeems the existing loan.” On December 29, 2017, the victim would have the victim wired KRW 30,000,000 to the above D bank deposit account in the name of the defendant, and the defendant would have the amount withdrawn by the defendant and deposited without the passbook in accordance with the direction of “B” be the money that the defendant withdraws from the Defendant under the direction of “B” and deposited into the account of the said D bank account in the name of the defendant.

Although I think, I have withdrawn 29,100,000 won after deducting 900,000 won from the fee on the same day in cash, and then have divided and remitted the above money to this account known to B.

Around January 2, 2018, when the victim made a false statement to the victim on or around January 2, 2018, the employee in charge of singing the victim, from January 14:0, 201 to the deposit account in the above D bank account in the name of the defendant, and the defendant tried to withdraw the above money in cash after transferring it to the I bank account in the name of the defendant under the direction of the "B". However, the victim did not have attempted to withdraw the money in cash after transferring it to the I bank account in the name of the defendant.

This is the defendant.