Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who operates a siren in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On March 24, 2011, the Defendant decided to arbitrarily prepare and submit a vehicle rental agreement under the name of D and D E in order to collect the said car from July 24, 2011 on November 4, 201 and to receive the unpaid rental cost of KRW 2,640,000, while having set up a civil lawsuit against D on March 24, 201.

1. On December 27, 2011, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the above Crenck Office, and (b) at the staff F, for the purpose of exercising civil action, the Defendant arbitrarily stated in the vehicle rental contract form “K5: K5; (b) G; (c) “H and address: I apartment house per sports : H: 601-105; E: Resident registration number; (b) address; (c) G: 601-105; (d) “I apartment house per sports : J, address; 601-105; (d) March 24, 2011; and (e) November 4, 2011 at the time of return; and (e) forged the above D and E’s private document rental contract in the name and duty of the relevant person.”

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. On December 27, 2011, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seocho-gu, Seoul, claiming the payment of KRW 2,640,000 of the outstanding vehicle rental fees against the said D and E, and exercised it by submitting the complaint to the relevant warden, accompanied by the forged vehicle rental contract under the name D and E, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1., as if it was duly formed.

B. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant submitted an application for a payment order claiming payment of KRW 2,640,000 of the outstanding vehicle rental fee to the above Seoul Central District Court, and attached the application to the employee who is not aware of the fact that the forged D and E vehicle rental contract was duly completed, as described in the above 1. Paragraph.