손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 1,069,256; and (b) against Plaintiff B, KRW 594,960; and each of the said money, from June 23, 2013 to September 2015.
1. The Defendant’s liability for damages, on June 23, 2013, on the ground that the Defendant fell against the Plaintiff’s work in front of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and was in dispute. The Defendant, upon considering the Plaintiffs, inflicted each injury on Plaintiff A, such as definites, etc. requiring approximately four weeks of treatment, and light cinites, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of treatment on the part of Plaintiff B, shall be recognized by considering the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole, without any dispute between the parties, or by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as set forth in Gap 1 and 2 (including the number of each party).
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant committed a tort against the plaintiffs, and thereby, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs.
2. Scope of liability for damages
A. Plaintiff A1) sought reimbursement of KRW 3,00,00 for lost earnings from June 23, 2013 to July 20, 2013. The Plaintiff’s reimbursement of KRW 3,00,000 is difficult to believe it as it is in light of the response to the order of submission by the head of Sungnam Tax Office, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s monthly income is KRW 3,00,00,00. The assertion on lost earnings is not acceptable. 2) The scope of damages recognized: 3,431,570 (A-1, 4-2, 4-3) - Subsequent medical treatment expenses: KRW 4,780,00 (A-5) to be limited to KRW 80% of the Defendant’s liability in light of all the circumstances revealed in the arguments, including the extent of damages suffered by Plaintiff A-2,569, 250, 306, 400, 570, 5701).