The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

2. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant received a notice of enlistment in active duty service from the head of the Gyeonggi-do District Military Manpower Office to enlistment on December 7, 2017, from the Defendant’s house located in Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Hongcheon-si, Hongcheon-si, Mancheon-si, on December 4, 2017, the Defendant failed to enlist in active duty service without justifiable grounds until December 7, 2017, for which three days have passed from the date of enlistment.

3. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the ground that the Defendant’s refusal to enlist according to conscience does not constitute “justifiable cause” under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act.

4. Judgment of the court below

A. The relevant legal doctrine’s refusal to perform the duty of military service involving gathering arms and military training on the grounds of conscientious decision based on a religious, ethical, moral, philosophical, or similar motive formed. If conscientious objection is a genuine conscience, such refusal constitutes “justifiable cause” under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act.

The genuine conscience referred to in this article is devout, firm, and true.

The belief deep means that it is a depth of a person's inner sense and it affects all his thoughts and actions.

The whole of life, which is not a part of the life, must be under the influence of its belief.

The belief that it is firm means that it is not flexible or variable.

Although it is not necessarily a fixed change, the belief has a clear substance, and it should not be easily changed as it is.

It means that the belief that it is true is not false, but is neither compromise nor strategic depending on circumstances.

Even the objectors are objectors.