On July 24, 2016, at around 19:03, the Defendant: (a) was in possession of “C” restaurant located in Seojin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B, and on the ground that he was tending the victim D (the age of 55) who was sitting on the ground that he did not get out of his reputation; (b) was in possession of 1.5 liter disease on the ground that she did not get out of his face; (c) was 2 times at two times at two times at two times at one face of the victim’s face; and (d) laid the victim’s bridge into the floor; (e) was fluencing the victim’s head, and (e) took the victim’s head, about three times at the victim’s head, she was injured by the victim, such as a snow pool, open eye, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of CCTV photographs and diagnostic certificates to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Code of the corresponding Article of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts is that the criminal defendant repents the wrong facts is favorable.

However, there is a significant possibility of criticism in that the defendant, who had been punished several times due to the same crime, was able to commit the crime of this case, and did not recover from damage.

In addition to these circumstances, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as character, behavior, career, and circumstances before and after the crime.