A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, including brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic), the Defendant is a person who establishes 9 guest rooms in which simple beds and sponsing facilities are installed inside the trade name “E”, and operates a sexual traffic business establishment.

From the beginning of June 2016 to August 25, 2016, the Defendant employed four female employees of the said “E” business establishment, and arranged the said female employees to see approximately 130,000 won from the unspecified number of male customers who find the said business establishment, and to have them flick up with their descendants and in person by having them flick up with their sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

(b) No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner without the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant illegally employed four (4) Thailand women, such as F, who did not have the status of stay that makes it possible to engage in job-seeking activities, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, from May 24, 2016 to August 25, 2016, as the F of Thailand nationality, where the Defendant had been staying as the status of stay for job-seeking activities (B-1).

2. On August 25, 2016, Defendant B: (a) at the foregoing “E” business establishment on August 25, 2016, the Defendant: (b) received a request from the business owner of the said business; (c) received a customer, and (d) provided guidance to female employees by the room where the customer is a guest to assist the customer in engaging in commercial sex acts; and (d) provided that, even if the female employee G was aware that he/she intended to engage in commercial sex acts against the customer, Defendant B’s act of arranging commercial sex acts, such as informing the customer of his/her intention to engage in commercial sex acts, from June 2016 to August 25, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer with respect to H, G, F, and I.